壁面边界对撞击合成动量角的影响研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180749

推进技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 2288-2295.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180749

壁面边界对撞击合成动量角的影响研究

王凯¹,雷凡培²,李鹏飞¹,杨岸龙¹,周立新¹

1.西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室;2.中国船舶工业集团有限公司，北京;100044

发布日期:2021-08-15
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 11502186国家自然科学基金（11502186）。

Effects of Wall Boundary on Resultant Momentum Angle of Impinging Jets

1.Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engine Laboratory,Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute,Xi’an 710100,China;2.China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited,Beijing 100044,China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究动量比对针栓式喷注器撞击雾化合成动量角的影响规律，基于三相的与水平集耦合流体容积法（CLSVOF）对贴壁液膜/自由液膜撞击的合成动量角进行了数值模拟，并与自由液膜/自由液膜撞击的合成动量角进行了对比，结合试验结果及理论预估结果详细考察了有无壁面条件下合成动量角与动量比的关系，深入分析了造成两者之间差异的根源，揭示了壁面边界对合成动量角产生影响的作用机制。结果表明：CLSVOF方法计算的合成动量角与试验结果一致，最大相对误差约为10%，大多数工况点的相对误差小于5%；有壁面边界的贴壁液膜/自由液膜撞击合成动量角显著大于无壁面边界的自由液膜/自由液膜撞击的；仅一路流体贴壁的撞击合成动量角与常用的入口动量比理论预测值最大相差20°以上，而两路均无贴壁或者均贴壁的撞击合成动量角与理论预测值吻合很好。这一显著差异的根源在于两者撞击形成的高压区分布显著不同。壁面的存在使得撞击点附近形成的高压区对两路流体作用不对称，有壁面边界时壁面承受高压迫使其对贴壁流体有强的作用力，导致垂直于壁面方向动量不守恒，根据入口动量比预测的理论不再适用。

关键词: 液体火箭发动机;喷注器;壁面边界;液膜;撞击;射流;雾化

Abstract: In order to study the effects of momentum ratio on the resultant momentum angle of impinging jets of the pintle injector, the resultant momentum angle of the impingement between an adherent liquid sheet and a free liquid sheet was simulated based on three phases CLSVOF (Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid) method, and compared with that of a free liquid sheet/ another free liquid sheet. The relationship between the resultant momentum angle and the momentum ratio was investigated in detail by combining the experimental results and the theoretical results in the presence or absence of wall. The causes of the differences between the two were analyzed in depth, and the mechanism of the effects of wall boundary on the resultant momentum angle was revealed. The results show that the resultant momentum angle calculated by the CLSVOF method is consistent with the experimental ones. The maximum relative error between them is about 10%, and the relative errors at most operating conditions are less than 5%. The resultant momentum angle of the impingement between the adherent liquid sheet and the free liquid sheet with wall boundary is remarkably larger than that of the free liquid sheet/ free liquid sheet with no wall boundary. The maximum error between the resultant momentum angle with only one-path adherent liquid and the common theoretical value predicted by using inlet momentum ratio is up to 20°.The resultant momentum angle that both or neither of two path fluids is adherent is in good agreement with the theoretical predictions. The cause of the marked difference is the significantly different distribution of the high pressure zones formed by the impact of the two. The existence of the wall makes the high pressure zone near the impact point act asymmetrically on the two fluids. When there is a wall boundary, the wall is subjected to high pressure, which forces also wall to exert a strong force on the adherent fluid because of action and reaction. As a result, the interaction between wall and fluid leads to non-conservation of momentum in the direction perpendicular to the wall. The prediction theory of inlet momentum ratio is no longer applicable.

Key words: Liquid rocket engine;Injector;Wall boundary;Liquid sheet;Impact;Jet flow;Atomzation

王凯,雷凡培,李鹏飞,杨岸龙,周立新. 壁面边界对撞击合成动量角的影响研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(10): 2288-2295.

WANG Kai¹,LEI Fan-pei²,LI Peng-fei¹,YANG An-long¹,ZHOU Li-xin¹. Effects of Wall Boundary on Resultant Momentum Angle of Impinging Jets[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(10): 2288-2295.

参考文献

[1] 岳春国，李进贤，侯晓，等. 变推力液体火箭发动机综述[J]. 中国科学 E辑：技术科学， 2009， 39(3):464-468.
[2] 袁宇. 猎鹰火箭发动机设计特点[J]. 太空探索， 2017， (7): 19-20.
[3] 安鹏，姚世强，王京丽，等. 针栓式喷注器的特点及设计方法[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术， 2016， (3):50-54.
[4] Heister S D. Pintle Injectors， Handbook of Atomization and Sprays:Theory and Applications[M]. New York：Springer， 2011.
[5] Boettcher P A， Damazo J S， Shepherd J E， et al. Visualization of Transverse Annular Jets[C]. Minneapolis， The 62nd Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamic， American Physical Society， 2009.
[6] Xinxin Fang， Chi-bing Shen. Study on Atomization and Combustion Characteristics of LOX/Methane Pintle Injectors[J]. Acta Astronautica， 2017， 136: 369-379.
[7] 方昕昕. 液氧/甲烷针栓式喷注器雾化及燃烧特性研究[D]. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2015.
[8] Santoro R J， Merkle C L. Main Chamber and Preburner Injector Technology[R]. NASA-1990049416.
[9] Kazuki Sakaki， Hiromitsu Kakudo， Shinji Nakaya， et al. Combustion Characteristics of Ethanol/Liquid-Oxygen Rocket-Engine Combustor with Planar Pintle Injector[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2017， 33(2):514-521.
[10] Kijeong Yu， Min Son， Koo Jaye . Effects of Opening Distance on Liquid-Gas Spray of Pintle Injector under Atmospheric Condition[J]. Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences， 2015， 43(7): 585-592.
[11] Min Son， Kijeong Yu， Radhakrishnan Kanmaniraja ， et al. Verification on Spray Simulation of a Pintle Injector for Liquid Rocket Engine[J]. Journal of Thermal Science， 2016， 25(1): 90-96.
[12] Min Son， Kijeong Yu， Koo Jaye ， et al. Injection Condition Effects of a Pintle Injector for Liquid Rocket Engines on Atomization Performances[J]. Journal of ILASS-Korea， 2015， 20(5): 114-120.
[13] Min Son， Kijeong Yu， Koo Jaye ， et al. Effects of Momentum Ratio and Weber Number on Spray Half Angles of Liquid Controlled Pintle Injector[J]. Journal of Thermal Science， 2015， 24(1): 37-43.
[14] Radhakrishnana Kanmaniraja， Min Son， Lee Keonwoong ， et al. Effect of Injection Conditions on Mixing Performance of Pintle Injector for Liquid Rocket Engine[J]. Acta Astronautica， 2018， 150: 105-116.
[15] Cheng Peng， Li Qinglian， Xu Shun， et al. On the Prediction of Spray Angle of Liquid-Liquid Pintle Injectors[J]. Acta Astronautica， 2017， 138: 145-151.
[16] 刘昌波，雷凡培，周立新. 两股湍流射流撞击雾化过程的数值研究[J]. 推进技术， 2014， 35(12): 1669-1678. (LIU Chang-bo， LEI Fan-pei， ZHOU Li-xin. Primary Atomization Simulations of Two Turbulent Impinging Jets[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2014， 35(12): 1669-1678.)
[17] 刘昌波，雷凡培，周立新. 雾化过程的一种Euler-Lagrangian 耦合算法[J]. 火箭推进， 2015， 41(2): 21-32.
[18] 郑刚，冯伟，聂万胜，等. 动量比对两股互击式喷嘴雾化特征的影响[J]. 航空动力学报， 2016， 31(9): 2283-2289.
[19] 郑刚，聂万胜，何博，等. 撞击角对撞击式喷嘴雾化特性影响研究[J]. 推进技术， 2015， 36(4): 608-613.
[20] Sakaki Kazuki， Kakudo Hiromitsu， Nakaya Shinji， et al. Optical Measurements of Ethanol/Liquid Oxygen Rocket Engine Combustor with Planar Pintle Injector[C]. Orlando: The 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference， 2015.
[21] Sakaki Kazuki， Kakudo Hiromitsu， Nakaya Shinji， et al. Performance Evaluation of Rocket Engine Combustors Using Ethanol/Liquid Oxygen Pintle Injector[R]. AIAA2016-5080.
[22] 王凯，杨国华，李鹏飞，等. 离心式喷嘴内部流动过程数值仿真分析[J]. 火箭推进， 2016， 42(4): 14-20.

壁面边界对撞击合成动量角的影响研究

Effects of Wall Boundary on Resultant Momentum Angle of Impinging Jets

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价